https://delivery-p150664-e1601913.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:fe3663d5-7a2b-4504-970e-0f3493135445/as/ART-US00186.avif?assetname=ART-US00186.jpg
Article | 4 min read
Consent in digital marketing
Court of Appeal rejects a subjective test
false
aiSummary
Summarise with AI
AI summary
/content/shoosmiths/index
Summarise with AI
title
true
Modal title
medium
17B078

Published: 17 June 2026
Authors: Kate Brimsted

In RTM v Bonne Terre Ltd, these familiar mechanisms came under scrutiny where an individual alleged that a betting company unlawfully profiled him and sent targeted direct marketing that fed his compulsive behaviour, increasing his gambling losses ([2026] EWCA Civ 488). He argued that his apparent consent was not validly or freely given due to his gambling addiction and associated vulnerability.

The Court of Appeal examined what must be proved to establish consent for cookies, personal data processing and direct marketing communications, and, in particular, whether the consent underpinning all three has a subjective aspect.

Download Kate Brimsted’s article below which examines the implications of the decision and what the ruling means.

Download article
Download Kate Brimsted’s article below which examines the implications of the decision and what the ruling means.
/content/dam/shoosmiths/download-documents/NB%20Consent%20in%20digital%20marketing%20JUNE%202026.pdf
Download

This article first appeared in the June 2026 issue of PLC Magazine.